LLMQuant x HKUDS x FICC: AI 金融研究系统合作地图
这是一篇专门整理:
1
LLMQuant x HKUDS x FICC
三者如何合作的 learning note。
前面我们已经分别做过:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
LLMQuant:
finance / quant domain layer
HKUDS:
general AI infra / RAG / agent / evaluation layer
FICC:
real financial market scenario
现在要把三者合起来。
一句话总结:
1
LLMQuant 提供金融量化研究语境,HKUDS 提供 AI infra / RAG / agent / evaluation 方法,FICC 提供真实金融市场任务场景。
更系统一点:
1
2
3
4
5
LLMQuant x HKUDS x FICC
= finance domain knowledge
+ AI research infrastructure
+ real market workflow
+ public-safe research artifacts
公开边界:
1
2
This is educational material and research infrastructure thinking.
It is not investment advice, trading advice, or an actionable alpha note.
中文边界:
1
2
这是公开学习笔记和研究系统设计,不是投资建议。
不包含内部数据、客户信息、未脱敏策略、实盘观点或可交易 alpha。
总体判断
LLMQuant、HKUDS、FICC 不是三条孤立线。
它们可以组成一个很完整的 AI Finance Research OS:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
FICC:
真实金融研究任务
LLMQuant:
金融语义、量化任务、策略研究、数据接口、agent workflow
HKUDS:
RAG、Graph、Agent、Harness、Evaluation、Workspace、Artifact
合在一起:
1
2
3
4
5
6
FICC event
-> LLMQuant finance understanding
-> HKUDS RAG / agent / harness infra
-> quant hypothesis
-> validation and bias diagnosis
-> public-safe research artifact
我们要做的不是简单“套项目”。 我们要做的是:
1
用 FICC 作为真实场景,把 LLMQuant 和 HKUDS 的能力重新组织成一个可运行、可复盘、可展示的研究系统。
三者角色分工
| 方向 | 角色 | 代表内容 | 在系统里的作用 |
|---|---|---|---|
| FICC | 场景层 | FI / FX / Commodities / Daily Brief / Event-to-Signal | 提供真实金融研究问题 |
| LLMQuant | 金融领域层 | QuantMind / data-mcp / Skills / Magents / awesome-trading-agents | 提供 finance / quant workflow |
| HKUDS | AI 基础设施层 | LightRAG / RAG-Anything / AutoAgent / OpenHarness / DeepResearch-Eval | 提供 RAG、agent、evaluation、harness |
可以压成:
1
2
3
FICC asks the question.
LLMQuant provides finance-native structure.
HKUDS provides AI-native infrastructure.
中文:
1
2
3
FICC 出题。
LLMQuant 给金融结构。
HKUDS 给 AI 基础设施。
Layer 1: Data Layer
FICC 需要的数据包括:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
rates
yield curve
credit spreads
FX spot / forward / swap
cross-currency basis
commodity futures
inventory reports
macro calendar
central bank text
news and events
LLMQuant 里最直接可合作的是:
1
data-mcp
它对应 FICC 的数据接口层:
1
2
3
4
FICC market data
-> MCP-style data access
-> agent-readable schema
-> daily brief / event store / validation engine
HKUDS 对应的是工具化和接口化:
1
2
3
4
CLI-Anything
AnyTool
AutoAgent
AgentSpace
这些项目启发我们:
1
2
不要让 agent 靠自然语言猜数据。
要让 agent 通过明确工具接口拿数据。
FICC 合作形态:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
FICC Data MCP
- rates endpoint
- FX endpoint
- commodities endpoint
- macro calendar endpoint
- event store endpoint
- forecast ledger endpoint
Layer 2: Knowledge Layer
FICC 最大的问题不是没有信息。 是信息太散:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
央行 statement
macro releases
EIA inventory report
WASDE
research reports
market commentary
historical daily briefs
LLMQuant 里最重要的是:
1
2
QuantMind
finance knowledge layer
它适合做:
1
2
3
4
5
FICC concept cards
FICC event cards
FICC report cards
FICC hypothesis cards
FICC strategy logic cards
HKUDS 里最适合合作的是:
1
2
3
4
LightRAG
RAG-Anything
MiniRAG
VideoRAG
对应能力:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
LightRAG:
fast graph-aware retrieval
RAG-Anything:
multimodal document understanding: PDF, table, chart, formula
MiniRAG:
lightweight retrieval memory
VideoRAG:
视频、访谈、课程、讲座进入知识系统
FICC 合作形态:
1
2
3
4
5
FICC Knowledge RAG
= QuantMind finance schema
+ LightRAG graph retrieval
+ RAG-Anything document ingestion
+ MiniRAG lightweight memory
用途:
1
2
3
4
5
Daily Brief evidence retrieval
central bank stance retrieval
commodity report parsing
historical analogies
counter-evidence search
Layer 3: Graph Layer
FICC 是天然图结构。
关系包括:
1
2
3
4
central bank -> policy rate -> yield curve -> FX
oil price -> inflation -> rates -> FX -> credit
inventory shock -> futures curve -> commodity FX
USD liquidity -> EM FX -> credit spreads
LLMQuant 的合作点:
1
2
QuantMind semantic knowledge graph
finance-domain entity and relation schema
HKUDS 的合作点:
1
2
3
4
GraphAgent
OpenGraph
GraphGPT
HiGPT
它们启发:
1
2
不要只做 text RAG。
要做 FICC cross-asset graph。
FICC Graph 可以包含节点:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Asset
Currency
Country
CentralBank
MacroVariable
Commodity
Curve
Event
Claim
Hypothesis
Evidence
ValidationReport
关系:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Event -> affects -> Asset
CentralBank -> sets -> PolicyRate
PolicyRate -> affects -> YieldCurve
YieldCurve -> affects -> FXForward
CommodityShock -> affects -> Inflation
Inflation -> affects -> Rates
Evidence -> supports -> Hypothesis
CounterEvidence -> challenges -> Hypothesis
ValidationReport -> evaluates -> Hypothesis
合作形态:
1
2
3
4
FICC Graph RAG
= QuantMind finance semantics
+ HKUDS graph intelligence
+ FICC cross-asset causality
Layer 4: Agent Layer
FICC Research OS 需要多个 agent。
LLMQuant 合作点:
1
2
3
4
Skills
Magents
awesome-trading-agents
strategy and risk workflows
HKUDS 合作点:
1
2
3
4
5
6
AutoAgent
AgentSpace
OpenSpace
nanobot
FastAgent
ClawTeam / ClawWork
这些项目可以启发我们设计:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Rates Agent
FX Agent
Commodities Agent
Macro Agent
Daily Brief Agent
Event Agent
Hypothesis Agent
Validation Agent
Skeptic Agent
Redaction Agent
Ledger Agent
关键不是 agent 多。 关键是 agent 必须有 harness:
1
2
3
4
5
6
fixed task
fixed input
fixed output schema
evidence required
counter-evidence required
human review required
FICC 合作形态:
1
2
3
4
FICC Multi-Agent Research Workflow
= LLMQuant finance task routing
+ HKUDS agent workspace
+ FICC domain agents
Layer 5: Harness Layer
这是 FICC008 直接对应的层。
LLMQuant 的 finance agent 如果要用于 FICC,必须有:
1
2
3
4
5
6
data boundary
tool boundary
memory boundary
output schema
bias diagnosis
public-safety review
HKUDS 里最相关的是:
1
2
OpenHarness
DeepResearch-Eval
OpenHarness 对应:
1
2
3
4
5
task contract
tool permission
schema validation
review gate
audit log
DeepResearch-Eval 对应:
1
2
3
4
5
research quality evaluation
evidence grounding
answer faithfulness
counter-evidence coverage
human edit distance
FICC 合作形态:
1
2
3
4
FICC Agent Harness
= OpenHarness-style control plane
+ LLMQuant finance workflow
+ FICC public-safe policy
这个方向非常重要。
因为金融 agent 最大问题不是“能不能生成内容”。 而是:
1
能不能在边界内生成可审计的研究内容。
Layer 6: Quant Workflow Layer
FICC 最后要进入 quant research。
LLMQuant 直接相关:
1
2
3
4
Magents
awesome-trading-agents
strategy workflows
factor / strategy hypothesis direction
HKUDS 相关:
1
2
3
4
5
6
Vibe-Trading
AI-Trader
FutureShow
AI-Researcher
Auto-Deep-Research
DeepResearch-Eval
FICC 对应:
1
2
3
4
Event-to-Signal Workflow
Forecast Ledger
Validation Report
Bias Diagnosis
合作形态:
1
2
3
4
5
FICC Event-to-Signal Engine
= LLMQuant quant strategy workflow
+ HKUDS AI-Researcher loop
+ HKUDS DeepResearch-Eval
+ FICC event store
标准流程:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
FICC event
-> hypothesis
-> feature
-> outcome
-> event study
-> bias diagnosis
-> research verdict
-> forecast ledger
公开边界:
1
signal candidate != trading signal
公开展示的是:
1
2
3
4
research hypothesis
validation framework
bias checklist
synthetic demo
不是:
1
2
3
live alpha
position sizing
execution instruction
Layer 7: Evaluation Layer
没有 evaluation,Research OS 只是内容生成器。
LLMQuant 可以提供:
1
2
3
4
5
finance-specific evaluation:
data validity
backtest health
strategy risk check
factor robustness
HKUDS 可以提供:
1
2
3
DeepResearch-Eval
OpenHarness
research agent evaluation
FICC 需要的 evaluation:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Daily Brief Quality
Evidence Grounding
Counter-Evidence Coverage
Cross-Asset Consistency
Timestamp Correctness
Bias Diagnosis Quality
Forecast Calibration
Human Review Pass Rate
Public-Safety Compliance
合作形态:
1
2
3
4
FICC Research Evaluation Suite
= DeepResearch-Eval style metrics
+ OpenHarness review gate
+ LLMQuant finance robustness checks
这能把 FICC 系统从 demo 提升成真正 research infra。
Layer 8: Artifact Layer
研究要沉淀成可展示资产。
LLMQuant 可以输出:
1
2
3
4
5
finance research notes
strategy specs
factor cards
risk reports
quant workflow docs
HKUDS 可以参考:
1
2
3
4
Paper2Slides
Litewrite
DeepResearch reports
agent product workflow
FICC 可以输出:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Daily FICC Brief
FICC Event Card
FICC Signal Candidate Card
FICC Bias Report
FICC Forecast Ledger
FICC AI Research OS Demo
FICC Agent Harness Spec
合作形态:
1
2
3
4
5
FICC Public Artifact Layer
= public-safe research outputs
+ website learning posts
+ GitHub project docs
+ private research ledger separation
这直接服务我们的 Credit OS。
总比对表
| FICC 需求 | LLMQuant 侧 | HKUDS 侧 | 合作结果 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 数据接口 | data-mcp | CLI-Anything / AnyTool | FICC Data MCP |
| 金融知识 | QuantMind | LightRAG / RAG-Anything | FICC Knowledge RAG |
| 图谱关系 | QuantMind semantic KG | GraphAgent / OpenGraph / GraphGPT | FICC Graph RAG |
| Agent workflow | Skills / Magents | AutoAgent / AgentSpace / OpenSpace | FICC Multi-Agent Workflow |
| Harness 控制 | finance workflow rules | OpenHarness | FICC Agent Harness |
| 研究自动化 | quant R&D direction | AI-Researcher / Auto-Deep-Research | FICC R&D Agent |
| 交易研究 | Magents / awesome-trading-agents | Vibe-Trading / AI-Trader | FICC Event-to-Signal |
| 预测复盘 | research ledger direction | FutureShow | FICC Forecast Ledger |
| 评估 | backtest / risk check | DeepResearch-Eval | FICC Research Evaluation |
| 公开表达 | strategy notes | Paper2Slides / Litewrite | FICC Public Artifact Layer |
优先合作路线
如果按我们当前目标排序,优先级是:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Priority 1:
QuantMind + LightRAG + RAG-Anything
-> FICC Knowledge RAG
Priority 2:
data-mcp + AnyTool / CLI-Anything
-> FICC Data MCP
Priority 3:
OpenHarness + DeepResearch-Eval
-> FICC Agent Harness / Evaluation
Priority 4:
AI-Researcher + Magents + Vibe-Trading
-> FICC Event-to-Signal Workflow
Priority 5:
FutureShow
-> Forecast Ledger / Prediction Evaluation
一句话:
1
先做知识和 harness,再做 research workflow,再做 quant validation。
不要一上来就冲实盘。
先把:
1
2
3
4
5
knowledge
evidence
harness
evaluation
ledger
打牢。
一个具体合作 Demo
可以做一个公开安全 demo:
1
FICC Daily Research OS Demo
输入:
1
2
3
4
5
sample market snapshot
sample macro calendar
sample central bank statement
sample EIA-style inventory note
sample FICC learning notes
系统:
1
2
3
4
5
6
LLMQuant data-mcp style input
QuantMind-style finance knowledge card
HKUDS LightRAG-style retrieval
HKUDS GraphAgent-style cross-asset graph
HKUDS OpenHarness-style control policy
HKUDS DeepResearch-Eval-style evaluation
输出:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Daily FICC Brief
Event Cards
Signal Candidate Cards
Evidence Pack
Counter-Evidence Pack
Bias Diagnostic Report
Forecast Ledger Update
Public-safe Website Post
这个 demo 非常适合展示:
1
AI agent + FICC domain + quant research + public-safe engineering
对外叙事
对外可以这样讲:
1
2
I am building a public-safe FICC AI Research OS.
It combines LLMQuant-style finance research workflow, HKUDS-style RAG / Graph / Agent / Evaluation infrastructure, and real FICC market tasks such as daily brief generation, event-to-signal workflow, forecast ledger, and human-reviewed research artifacts.
中文:
1
2
我在构建一个公开安全的 FICC AI Research OS。
它把 LLMQuant 的金融量化研究工作流、HKUDS 的 RAG / Graph / Agent / Evaluation 基础设施,以及 FICC 的真实金融研究场景结合起来,形成 daily brief、event-to-signal、forecast ledger 和 human-reviewed research artifact 的闭环。
面试表达
如果被问:
1
LLMQuant、HKUDS 和 FICC 怎么结合?
可以回答:
1
我会把 FICC 看成真实金融场景,把 LLMQuant 看成 finance-native research workflow,把 HKUDS 看成 general AI research infrastructure。具体来说,LLMQuant 的 QuantMind 和 data-mcp 可以提供金融知识和数据接口;HKUDS 的 LightRAG、RAG-Anything、GraphAgent 可以提供检索和图谱能力;OpenHarness 和 DeepResearch-Eval 可以提供 agent 控制和评估;AI-Researcher、Vibe-Trading、AI-Trader 可以启发 event-to-signal 和 quant validation workflow。最终合成一个 FICC AI Research OS:从 public-safe data ingestion,到 daily brief,到 event-to-signal,到 validation、bias diagnosis、forecast ledger 和 human review。
如果被问:
1
这个系统和普通金融 RAG 有什么区别?
可以回答:
1
普通金融 RAG 主要回答问题或总结文档。这个系统不止做问答,而是把 RAG 作为 research memory,把 Graph RAG 作为 cross-asset relationship layer,把 agent workflow 作为研究执行层,把 quant validation 作为验证层,把 harness 和 human review 作为控制层,把 forecast ledger 作为复盘层。所以它是一个研究操作系统,而不是单点 RAG 应用。
当前结论
LLMQuant、HKUDS、FICC 的合作可以压成:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
LLMQuant:
finance domain and quant workflow
HKUDS:
AI infra, RAG, graph, agent, harness, evaluation
FICC:
real financial research scenario
最终合成:
1
2
3
4
5
FICC AI Research OS
= FICC scenario
+ LLMQuant finance workflow
+ HKUDS AI infrastructure
+ public-safe research artifacts
一句话收束:
1
LLMQuant gives the finance brain, HKUDS gives the AI infrastructure, and FICC gives the real market training ground.
中文:
1
LLMQuant 给金融大脑,HKUDS 给 AI 基础设施,FICC 给真实市场训练场。